Obama Lawyer Admits the Birth Certificate is a Forgery

After a Maricopa County law enforcement agency conducted a six-month forensic examination which determined that the image of Obama’s alleged 1961 Certificate of Live Birth posted to a government website in April, 2011 is a digital fabrication and that it did not originate from a genuine paper document, arguments from an Obama eligibility lawyer during a recent New Jersey ballot challenge hearing reveals the image was not only a fabrication, but that it was likely part of a contrived plot by counterfeiters to endow Obama with mere political support while simultaneously making the image intentionally appear absurd and, therefore, invalid as evidence toward proving Obama’s ineligibility in a court of law.

Taking an audacious and shocking angle against the constitutional eligibility mandate, Obama’s lawyer, Alexandra Hill, admitted that the image of Obama’s birth certificate was a forgery and made the absurd claim that, therefore, it cannot be used as evidence to confirm his lack of natural born citizenship status. Therefore, she argued, it is “irrelevant to his placement on the ballot”.


It gets stranger all the time! And what is truly amazing is how wilfully blind so many Obama worshipers are. Our beloved state broadcaster has never mentioned this small issue of Obama’s eligibility to actually be the president of those united states, it refuses to mention anything about him which may give people pause for thought. They worship him!

This whole is creepy!

So, when writin…

So, when writing a constitution I am writing it making a few assumptions, one is that the people are a virtuous, Christian people. This will impact on many things, one being that I don’t have a marriage clause, because in a healthy society, no one seriously considers that sodomites could wed each other, another is that I would not have women voting in this theoretical Federation, women’s suffrage has caused too much trouble and most women, are not interested in politics anyway. I did include a clause in Article II prohibiting women from voting, but was not sure if I should include it.

The preamble is the most iffy bit I think, I suppose each preamble will be different according to who writes it and among which people are having it written for them. I like the first Article, it lays down, much more clearly then say the American constitution, what is and is not allowed, the right to life specifically prohibits abortion, so that no harpy can claim she has the right to kill her child. The slavery clause also prohibits usury, this would be quite important in years to come, when banking interests are attempting, once again, to re-enslave the people, this would mean no credit cards with 20% APR, no Wonga.Com charging over 2000% interest on a short-term loan etc…

The Section IX is a lot more strict on government or enforcement agencies then is now the case in America or anywhere else I can think! It not only ensures someones house papers and effects can’t be searched without warrant, it makes the intercepting of communication, the hacking of their computers or a search of the person, something they would need a warrant for as well. Remember, this is for a theoretical situation, where we don’t have any immigrants, they all left and went home, so very little crime, a virtuous and Christian people etc, etc…

No faffing about with the right to keep and bear arms, not sure about Section XI, it is something I like the sound of, but it could be construed to allow sodomites to have their little ghettos where they hang out rainbow flags and felate each other on street corners! But it could also be used by Amish types, so I am minded to keep it! Any thoughts?

Section XVI, the reason I single out Senators as different, is because I would be attempting to establish a new aristocracy, or something approaching it.

Not sure about Article II, Section I, I want something that prohibits hordes of foreigners from trampling our lands, but, am not sure exactly how to word it!

Section II, I think with all the porn in the world, we need a censor, not someone censoring politics or blogs, but someone censoring vile images, which, are not speech!

And, most importantly, in Section III, the prohibition of political parties, this is essential. Even if this was the only thing I could actually accomplish, I would be happy if this was to pass. Political parties divide our peoples, it makes people stupid, they argue with someone they should be allying with, all because of some stupid personality or some idiotic policy, health care or pensions or some other irrelevancy. The worst thing about political parties, is that good people will say, ‘I shall vote conservative and they will stop immigration’, when they won’t, in fact they speed it up!!! Whilst lefties say, ‘I will vote Labour for peace and justice’ and they get Serbia, Sierra Leone, Iraq, Kosovo, Afghanistan and Iraq! Not exactly getting what you voted for is it? So political parties will be abolished, people can vote, but they shall vote for the man, instead of the party!

The General Assembly, I suppose you could call it whatever you want, a parliament, a congress, a council, but I think this is an improvement on what we have now, it allows for election to the House of Delegates, but the Senate is in effect a life appointment, each Senator can appoint a successor, most I imagine would appoint a son, but they don’t have to, if they have a feckless son, they might appoint a nephew or brother or even a friend. But just in case the appointed successor is not up to it, the rest of the Senators have a say in who gets to succeed, so that the truly feckless can be kept out, again, I am assuming that we are dealing with virtuous people here! The Delegates are elected in much the same way that the American Senate used to be elected, by the states/cantons, in the American constitution, the legislatures had the rights to elect a Senator, in my constitution, the state or canton will decide for itself, so it could be the legislature electing the delegates or it could be that they are elected by a popular vote, it will be up to the constituent member of the Federation.

The composition of the Senate and Delegates, restrains ‘democracy’ without abolishing it, it is not mob rule, but it does allow for some popular influence.

Another thing I like, it the option of a referendum on possibly every Act of the Assembly, this is used in Switzerland to keep their politicians in check, it is something they hate, but must put up with, and so it would be in my theoretical Federation.

The war powers of this Federation are retrained, and unless they have been invaded or attacked, they must seek a declaration of war from the General Assembly and must have a referendum on this, with each voter who approves war, signing himself up to fight. In this theoretical Federation, voting is public, not secret, people should not be ashamed of how they vote. Secrecy was a good idea when it was introduced, but it has passed its usefulness, especially in a virtuous polity. So we would know how people vote, and so could have internet voting, but with open voting everyones voting record could be accessed, this would keep voting fraud down and we could see who voted themselves into the army.

Also a special war tax would be imposed on everyone, this would ensure only a truly popular war could be fought for any length of time. No more Iraqs or Afghanistans or Serbias or Somalias or Vietnams! Unless people don’t mind the tax, and volunteering to fight!

Section XI has one of the most important clauses, and that is;‘No tax shall be laid on incomes, capital gains, inheritances, property or gifts of an individual or family’ This ensures that no government can pile tax upon tax, ones income profits, inheritance, property and gifts belong to one, not the government, and with this, they shall be powerless to take your money. I specifically make this about individuals and families, so that corporations, can still be taxed.

The government is also prohibited from creating a national debt, this is one of the central powers that modern states have, and it is one mine, shall not have.

I’m not a fan of copyright or patent laws, it seems the super rich use this to squeeze more money out of the poor for no reason other than they had something developed in their labs fifty years ago. I don’t really think that is right! Also, I hate Hollywood, anything that hits their pockets has got to be good!

And so onto Article V, instead of a president, I have a council of nine, kinda like the Venetian one, but without the Doge! The office of president, along with the Supreme Court seem to me, to be the greatest weaknesses in the current American system, between them they dominate that country, which they should not do. My system would lessen the possibilities of a Lincoln or a Roosevelt or a Tony Blair or an Obama, with more than one leader, it diffuses power and could contain a danger like those above. Although at least six of the nine Consuls would have to agree on everything, they could pardon or honour anyone they wish.

Another important one, is the Supreme Court, the Judges have terms, so can’t be as almighty as the American version!

And another office I would introduce is the Tribune of the people, a council of five tribunes, elected by lot, so that possibly anyone could serve in this position for a ten-year term, I don’t prohibit further terms, because the likelihood of being chosen twice by lot is highly unlikely! They  would have power to appeal to the Assembly and the Consulate, they could investigate government, they could make a fuss and embarrass people, they could bring issues to trial and make recommendations for legislation, not all-powerful, but a good speed bump for those greedy for power.

In describing the Cantons and their powers, it states unequivocally that each can leave the Federation at any time and for any reason, with this and the fact that the army is the militias of the cantons, one would hope that no American civil war situation could arise. Each canton could have its own sort of government, monarchial, direct democracy, representative etc…And most importantly, each Canton may restrict immigration into their cantons, no automatic right of abode. This could be a great firewall against any future mass migrations, as only some cantons, one would hope, are stupid enough to allow immigrants into their cantons, most others could insulate themselves from this, with this power.

Overall, there is little democracy in this, which I think is only good, the Tribune is there by lottery to stand up for peoples rights and against power, the courts are elected by the Assembly, but only for one term, the Senators are appointed, but only with the concurrence of the other Senators, the delegates are elected, but they are representative only of a state or canton, not a constituency, but they are influential in who they elect, the Consuls and the Judges as well as confirming the appointments made by the Consuls.

It seems a well-balanced constitution, but if there is anything you think needs alteration or revision, leave a comment!

On Constitutions and Eternity

Constitutions are means to constitute what are the fundamental rules of governance for an organisation, whether it is a bridge club, the local rugby club, the Swiss Federation, Apple Inc or the even the Soviet Union. The American constitution is the most infamous codified constitution known, I would imagine and being an expression of the enlightenment, it should be something I am instinctively against, and I am, on an instinctive, idealistic plane. However, it seems that the days of kings and chivalry are long over, and to codify how much you can get screwed by the government may actually be important. The American constitution is enlightening,(not in that way!) for one reason it should not be, it proves that all constitutions can be ignored and overthrown whilst feigning loyalty to it. The American government today is obviously in breach of the spirit of the constitution as well as many of its clauses. The most infamous being Obama’s questionable place of birth and his obstruction of people trying to discover whether he is in fact a natural-born citizen. Others that I can think of off the top of my head would be the existence of a massive national security apparatus, a permanent established army of many millions of men, the CIA, FBI, NSA among others, surveillance on a massive, unholy scale that would have terrified the writers of the constitution, a presidency that seems to be powerful without any limits, whose occupants can issue decrees, some of which are only known to people in government. The Supreme Court is too high and mighty for its boots, and no one is willing to challenge it, it holds more power than any king ever did, whatever it says in inviolable, and no one seems to think, ‘hey, wait a sec’.

So constitutions, whether written and codified or not as is the case with Britain, can be and currently are being subverted by a nasty clique that seems intent on destroying us. Now, it does seem that the American constitution is faring a little bit better than the British one, which has been swept away in the last thirty years. But the American one seems to be kept in its procedures, more than in its original intent or its spirit. The American government will tie itself in knots trying to make everything ‘constitutional’ whether it is or not. The Supreme Court seems to be able to say that the constitution can mean anything, it means every woman is entitled to kill her child in utero apparently, although I’ve never seen that section or article myself. Recently the Supreme Court said that Obamacare was ‘constitutional’, whatever that means anymore. How?

The whole Constitution thing in America is actually keeping people from making the break they need to make, it is over, and it is time to begin again. The United States is finished as it was, whether you believe it was good or bad, doesn’t matter, it’s over! Now, you have to look for something else, whether it is a ‘white republic’ or a Vermont republic or an independent Texas or whatever, but you need to start again.

It is the same over here in Europe, we can’t go back, it is too late, the UK is over too, at some point Scotland and Wales will go independent, England will be in chaos due to the race problems, and the rest of Europe, well it is anyone’s guess. But the old order is coming to an end. I sometimes wonder what people though in the year 400 as they looked forward, would they have foreseen the end of Rome in 76 years, earlier if you count the second sack of Rome, or would they have thought things would continue just as they had been for four hundred years?

The transformation from hegemon to ruin took place over a fifty year period of immigration, economic crisis, wars and political crises, it dragged on for decades, until at some point people realised it was over. But even after the fall of Rome, many of the new kings and leaders considered themselves successors to Roman authority and would have protected Roman custom, even encouraged it, they would have relied on Latin or Greek speaking scribes, this was in no way a sudden collapse, it really was an evolution over time. It was only in 800 AD that a new Emperor was recognised in the West, and that was Charlemagne. So at some point between 476 and 800, it was realised that the Roman Empire in the West had collapsed. over 300 years!

Now, if you were in the future looking back on now, what do you think this period would be?

I don’t think its the German crossing of the Rhine in 406, I think that was like our Empire Windrush in 1948.

What about our sack of Rome? Could that be Detroit? London last year? Paris in 2005? Or is that still to come?

We can know we are not at the end, as that would take a formal abdication of power, but how long off is that?

Even after the fall of Rome, I imagine that there were many city dwellers and peasants and Senators and soldiers and traders who thought it would all go back to how it’s always been, perhaps with a German Emperor instead, but can anyone have realised what lay in store for them and their progeny? The division of the West into thousands of autonomous polities and semi autonomous polities, the sacking and destruction of the richest part of the world in less than 200 years time, and it’s forced conversion to Islam. The blending of the German overloads and the Gallic, Hispanic, Italic and Britannic into new races of men, the birth of dozens of new languages, the thousand-year long war with Islam with the Mediterranean as a frontline instead of the nice cosy safe bit at the centre of the known world.

Nothing would ever be the same, and we still live with the consequences, what will the world be like in 76 years? How about 200? We can’t know and the arrogance of those who think the American constitution will last forever, just because it has lasted the previous two centuries, is baffling.

A constitution should be useful, and let’s be honest, can only work when you have a virtuous people. America has neither.




A Constitution

I know this is not really the problem in the world today, it is the spirit of the people, the faith of nations or lack thereof that is degrading us more and more, but it was something I decided to have a go at anyway, to try to create a method, whereby no one could be all that powerful, and no one man could be seen as a leader, they way Cameron or Obama are seen, or given the amount of power they have.

This is my hypothetical constitution for a federation of our peoples, does not need to be giant or tiny, but here it is!


                              Constitution of the Federation

KNOW THAT BEFORE GOD, for the health of our souls and those of our ancestors and heirs, to the honour of God and the exaltation of His Holy Church, we set out the following Constitution.



That it is granted, in perpetuity, that all Men shall be free, and shall have their rights undiminished, and their Liberties unimpaired. That all Men are born equal in Dignity and Honour. That they are endowed, by God, with Reason and Conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of Brotherhood.


Everyone’s Right to Life shall be protected by Law, whether born or unborn. No one shall be deprived of his Life intentionally save in the execution of a sentence of a Court following his conviction of a crime for which this penalty is provided by Law.


No one shall be subjected to torture or cruel and unusual punishments.


No one shall be held in slavery; slavery and the slave trade shall be prohibited in all their forms, including usury. No one shall be required to perform forced or compulsory labour, save in the execution of a sentence of a Court, following his conviction of a crime for which this penalty is provided by Law.


Everyone has the right to own property alone as well as in association with others. No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his property. The Right to own, maintain, use, protect, and dispose of private property will not be infringed, nor shall private property be taken for Public use.


No Law abridging the freedom of speech; or the Right of the people peaceably to assemble, or to petition government for a redress of grievances, shall be made.


The right of the People to be secure in their Persons, Houses, Homes, Papers, Communications, Stored Information and Effects, against unreasonable searches, monitoring, interception and seizures, shall not be violated, whether by Government or private parties, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or Affirmation, and particularly describing the Person, Place or Thing to be monitored, intercepted, searched or seized.


The Right of the People to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.


No one shall be held to answer for a crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or Public Danger; nor shall any Person be tried for the same offence twice and be put in jeopardy of life or limb again; nor shall he be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law.


In all criminal prosecutions, the Accused shall enjoy the Right to a speedy and Public trial, by an impartial Jury within the Community the crime has been committed, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the Witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining Witnesses in his favour, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.


No Man shall be seized or imprisoned, or stripped of his Rights or Possessions, or outlawed or exiled, or deprived of his standing in any other way, nor will anyone proceed with force against him, or send others to do so, except by the Lawful Judgement of his equals or by the Law of the land. The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended.


For a trivial offence, a Man shall be fined only in proportion to the degree of his offence, and for a serious offence correspondingly, but not so heavily as to deprive him of his livelihood. In the same way, a merchant shall be spared his merchandise, and a husbandman the implements of his husbandry. No fines shall be imposed except by the assessment on oath of reputable men of the neighbourhood.


Senators shall be fined only by their equals, and only in proportion to the gravity of their offence.


Excessive bail shall not be required.


In suits at Common Law, the Right of trial by Jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a Jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court, than according to the rules of the Common Law.


All Men may enter or leave this Federation unharmed and without fear, and may stay or travel within it, for purposes of trade, in accordance with Ancient and Lawful customs. It shall be Lawful for any Man to leave and return to this Federation unharmed and without fear, preserving his allegiance, except in time of War, for some short period, for the common benefit of all Men. People that have been imprisoned or outlawed in accordance with Federal Law, or people from a country that is at War with us – are excepted from this provision.


The People shall always have the right to Review, Reform, Change or Abolish this Constitution.



To obtain the General Consent of the People, Senators and Delegates shall be summoned to a General Assembly individually by letter, to come together on a fixed day and at a fixed place. All legislative powers herein granted shall be vested in a General Assembly, which shall consist of a Senate and a Chamber of Delegates.


The Chamber of Delegates shall be composed of Members chosen every third Year by the several Cantons, the manner of the elections shall be decided by each Canton.

No Man shall be a Delegate who shall not have attained to the Age of twenty-five Years, and who shall not, when elected, be an Inhabitant of that Canton in which he shall be chosen.

Each Canton shall be entitled to one vote in the Chamber of Delegates

When vacancies happen in the Delegation from any Canton, the Intendant thereof shall issue Writs of Election to fill such Vacancies.

The Chamber of Delegates shall choose their Speaker and other Officers; and shall have the sole Power of Impeachment


The Senate shall be composed of appointed Senators. Each Senator shall have one Vote.

The Senate shall chose their Speaker and other Officers.

The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments. When sitting for that Purpose, they shall be on Oath or Affirmation. When one of the Consuls is tried, the Lord Chief Justice shall preside: And no Person shall be convicted without the Concurrence of two-thirds of the Members present.

Judgment in Cases of Impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from Office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of Honour, Trust or Profit within the Federation: but the Party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgment and Punishment, according to Law.


The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Delegates, shall be prescribed in each Canton by the Assembly thereof.

Each Canton may choose however many Delegates they wish, the Delegation shall attend the General Assembly and each Delegate may speak in the Chamber of Delegates, however, each Delegation shall be entitled to only one vote, no matter how populous or large that Canton may be. The Chamber of Delegates may, if it agrees in unanimity allow Delegations from non-Cantonal organisations, they shall have all the rights and privileges as all other Delegations.

Senators shall be appointed to an open-ended term, they may serve as long as they feel able. When they do retire or die, they may choose as their successor any other man and the Senate need only confirm this choice by simple majority. If the Senate does not approve, his second choice shall be considered and so on, until the Senate agrees to a successor. When a Senator dies and has no Will or Testament, the Senate shall offer the position to a close family member or friend who shall be suitably virtuous and God-fearing. If a Senator is impeached and convicted, he shall be removed from office and the position shall be offered to whomever the Senate feel is appropriate for the position. The numbers of Senators may be increased from the present level, however, the Senate must agree unanimously to each new position, and once created, those positions shall be like the original number of Senators and shall have all the same rights and privileges.


The General Assembly shall meet at least once in every Year, on a day that they shall appoint by Law.


Each Chamber shall be the Judge of the Elections, Returns and Qualifications of its own Members, and a Majority of each shall constitute a Quorum to do Business; but a smaller number may adjourn from day-to-day, and may be authorized to compel the Attendance of absent Members, in such Manner, and under such Penalties as each Chamber may provide.

Each Chamber may determine the Rules of its Proceedings, punish its Members for disorderly Behaviour, and, with the Concurrence of two-thirds, expel a Member.

Each Chamber shall keep a Journal of its Proceedings, and from time to time publish the same, excepting such Parts as may in their Judgment require Secrecy; and the Yeas and Nays of the Members of either Chamber on any question shall, at the Desire of one fifth of those Present, be entered on the Journal.

Neither Chamber, during the Session of the General Assembly, shall, without the Consent of the other, adjourn for more than three days, nor to any other Place than that in which the two Chambers shall be sitting.


They shall in all Cases, except Treason, Felony and Breach of the Peace, be privileged from Arrest during their Attendance at the Session of their respective Chamber, and in going to and returning from the same; and for any Speech or Debate in either Chamber, they shall not be questioned in any other Place.

No Delegate, Senator or Consul shall, during the Time for which he was elected, be appointed to any Civil Office under the Authority of the Federal Government, or the Emoluments whereof shall have been increased during such time; and no Person holding any Federal Office, shall be a Member of the General Assembly or Consulate during his Continuance in Office.


Every Bill which shall have passed the General Assembly, shall, before it become a Law, be presented to the Consulate; If they approve, they shall sign it, but if not they shall return it, with their Objections to that Chamber in which it shall have originated, who shall enter the Objections at large on their Journal, and proceed to reconsider it. If after such Reconsideration two-thirds of that Chamber shall agree to pass the Bill, it shall be sent, together with the Objections, to the other Chamber, by which it shall likewise be reconsidered, and if approved by two-thirds of that Chamber, it shall become a Law. But in all such Cases the Votes of both Chambers shall be determined by Yeas and Nays, and the Names of the Persons voting for and against the Bill shall be entered on the Journal of each Chamber respectively. If any Bill shall not be returned by the Consulate within ten Days (Sundays excepted) after it shall have been presented to them, the Same shall be a Law, in like Manner as if they had signed it, unless the General Assembly by their Adjournment prevent its Return, in which Case it shall not be a Law.

All Acts of the General Assembly, once approved by the Consulate, excepting adjournments and other procedural acts, may be put to a plebiscite of all people entitled to vote. If within one hundred days of the passing of an Act, one fifth of the eligible voters of the Federation, or one-third of the Cantons, request a plebiscite, one shall take place in as speedy a manner as is allowed. If a majority of the voters and Cantons approve, it shall pass, if not, that Act shall not pass.

Every Order, Resolution, or Vote to which the Concurrence of the General Assembly may be necessary (except on a question of Adjournment) shall be presented to the Consulate; and before the Same shall take Effect, shall be approved by them, or being disapproved by them, shall be re-passed by two-thirds of the Senate and Chamber of Delegates, according to the Rules and Limitations prescribed in the Case of a Bill.


The General Assembly shall have Power;

To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay, and provide for the common Defence and general Welfareof the Federation; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the Federation;

Make Treaties;

Coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin, and fix the Standard of Weights and Measures;

Regulate Commerce with foreign States, and within the Federation;

Establish a uniform Rule of Naturalisation, and uniform Laws on the subject of Bankruptcies throughout the Federation;

To provide for the Punishment of counterfeiting the Securities and current Coin of the Federation;

Promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts;

Define and punish Piracies and Felonies committed, and Offences against the Laws of Nations;

Declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures;

Provide and maintain a Navy, and make Rules and Regulations for its Governance:

Provide for calling forth the Militia to execute Federal Laws, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;

Provide for organizing, training, arming, governing and disciplining the Militia when employed in Federal service, reserving to the Cantons respectively, the Appointment of the Officers;

To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over all Places purchased by the Consent of the Canton in which the Same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards, and other needful Buildings; And

To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the Federation, or in any Ministry or Officer thereof.


All acts of war by the Federation, except in the repelling of an immediate invasion or attack, must be established through a Declaration of War issued by the General Assembly, as well as a plebiscite of all eligible voters. All able-bodied citizens who vote for war must enlist in the military.

At times of official peace, the decision to aid, assist, or oppose any foreign government or revolutionary movement will be reserved to the People, as individuals.


No money shall be drawn from the treasury, but in Consequence of Appropriations made by Law; and a regular Statement and Account of the Receipts and Expenditures of all public Money shall be published from time to time.

No tax shall be laid on incomes, capital gains, inheritances, property or gifts.

No tax can be laid if not for the general common good. All Men shall have the right to participate personally, through their representatives and through their vote in a plebiscite to voice their wishes and opinions on any tax laid.

No borrowing of any money shall be done at any time, or for any purpose.

No bill of attainer or ex post facto law shall be passed.

Nor shall any law grant copyrights or patents, or recognize their legitimacy.



Executive Power is vested in the Consulate, which shall consist of nine Consuls. They shall hold their Office during good behaviour and be elected, as follows:

In consequence of the resignation, retirement, death or impeachment and conviction of a sitting Consul, each Chamber of the General Assembly shall appoint, in such Manner as they may direct, a Number of Electors, not exceeding twelve each;

The Electors shall meet in conclave and by unanimity, select a Man of good repute to serve as Consul.

The chosen Consul may be any Man of good repute, and he may sit as Consul until he may resign, retire, die or be impeached and convicted by the General Assembly.


The Consulate shall appoint a Commander-in-Chief of the Navy and the Militia of the several Cantons, when called into the actual Service of the Federation; they may require the Opinion, in writing, or otherwise of the Ministers, upon any subject relating to the Duties of their respective Offices, and each Consul shall have Power to Grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offences against the Federation, except in Cases of Impeachment.

They shall together, have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the General Assembly, to make Treaties, provided two-thirds of the General Assembly concur; and they shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the General Assembly, shall appoint Ambassadors, Ministers, Judges, and all other Officers of the Federation, whose Appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be established by Law: but the General Assembly may by Law vest the Appointment of such inferior Officers, as they think proper, in the Consulate alone, in the Courts of Law, or in the Ministers.

The Consulate shall have Power to fill up all Vacancies that may happen during the Recess of the General Assembly, by granting Commissions which shall expire at the End of their next Session.

Each Consul shall have the power to Knight other men for Acts of Greatness, Courage, Valour, Piety or Daring. Other titles and awards as may be established, shall likewise, be the gift of each individual Consul.


The Consulate shall from time to time recommend to the Consideration of the General Assembly such Measures as they shall judge necessary and expedient. They may, on extraordinary Occasions, convene both Chambers, or either of them, or in Case of Disagreement between the Chambers. With Respect to the Time of Adjournment, they may adjourn them to such Time as they shall think proper; they shall receive Ambassadors and other public Ministers; they shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed, and shall Commission all the Officers of the Federation.


A Consul and all civil Officers of the Federation, shall be removed from Office on Impeachmentfor, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanour’s.



The judicial Power of the Federation, shall be vested in one Supreme Court and in such inferior Courts as the General Assembly may from time to time ordain and establish. The Judges shall hold their Offices during good Behaviour. Judges of the Supreme Court shall be chosen by the Consulate and approved by the General Assembly. There shall be only nine Justices of the Supreme Court, and one judge shall be appointed each year and one shall retire. Supreme Court Justices may only serve one nine-year term. If a Justice resigns, dies or is impeached and convicted before his term has expired, the Consulate shall choose a replacement, to be confirmed by the General Assembly, the replacement shall only serve the remainder of the term of the Justice he shall replace.


Judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the Federation, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under this Authority; to all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls; to all Cases of admiralty; to Controversies to which the Federation shall be a Party. In addition, disputes among members of the same Canton may be adjudicated by the Supreme Court if the laws of that Canton grant such jurisdiction to the Supreme Court.


In all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a Canton shall be Party, the Supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction. In all the other Cases before mentioned, they shall have appellate Jurisdiction, both as to Law and Fact, with such Exceptions, and under such Regulations as the General Assembly shall make.


The Trial of all Crimes, except in Cases of Impeachment, shall be by Jury; and such Trial shall be held in the Canton where the said Crimes shall have been committed; but when not committed within any Canton, the Trial shall be at such Place or Places as the General Assembly may by Law have directed.

ARTICLE IV – The Cantons


Full Faith and Credit shall be given in each Canton to the public Acts, Records, and judicial Proceedings of every other Canton. And the General Assembly may by general Laws prescribe the Manner in which such Acts, Records and Proceedings shall be proved, and the Effect thereof.


Each Canton is independent and sovereign. It retains all such freedoms, powers, jurisdictions, rights and privileges not expressly delegated to the Federation. Each Canton has the right of secession from the Federation at any time and for any reason, providing that the electors of the Canton have voted by two-thirds in favour in a plebiscite. Each Canton shall have power to govern itself.


The Citizens of each Canton shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several Cantons. A Person charged in any Canton with Treason, Felony, or other Crime, who shall flee from Justice, and be found in another Canton, shall on demand of the executive Authority of that place from which he fled, be delivered up, to be removed to the place having Jurisdiction of the Crime.


New Cantons may be admitted into this Federation; but no new Cantons shall be formed or erected within the Jurisdiction of any other Canton; nor any Canton be formed by the Junction of two or more Cantons, or parts of Cantons, without the Consent of the Cantons concerned as well as of the electors concerned, by plebiscite.

New Cantons may be created by an act of the General Assembly. Once a community has a certain population, of which a certain number shall be electors, have assembled in a territory, they may request the Federation to recognise the said territory as a new Canton. That Canton may choose, or not, to establish a constitution and establish its own rules and institutions as it sees fit.

The General Assembly shall have Power to dispose of and make all needful Rules and Regulations respecting the Territory or other Property belonging to the Federation.


The Federation shall respect, and guarantee in law, the autonomy of the Cantons.

The principle of subsidiarity shall be observed in the allocation and performance of all tasks.

All Cantons, Cities, Towns, Communes and Ports shall enjoy all their Liberties and Free Customs.

The Cantons may enter into agreements with each other and establish common organisations and institutions. In particular, they may jointly undertake tasks of regional importance together. They may also jointly undertake tasks of cultural importance together.

The Federal Government may participate in such organisations or institutions within the scope of its powers, only at the request of the Cantons concerned.

Agreements between Cantons must not be contrary to the law, to the interests of the Federation or to the rights of other Cantons. The Federation must be notified of such agreements.

The Cantons shall comply with inter-Cantonal Law.

Federal law shall take precedence over any conflicting provision of Cantonal Law.

The Federation shall take into account any possible consequences for the Cantons in its activities.

Each Canton may adopt a constitution. This requires the approval of the Electors and must be capable of being revised if the majority of the Electors so request.

The Cantons shall be consulted by the Federal government on policy decisions that affect their powers or their essential interests and they shall be informed fully and in good time.

The Cantons shall implement Federal law in accordance with this Constitution and Federal legislation.

The Federation shall allow the Cantons all possible discretion to organise their own affairs and shall take account of cantonal particularities.

The Cantons may authorise inter-cantonal bodies, by treaty, to issue legislative provisions implementing a treaty, provided this treaty has been approved according to the same procedure that applies to legislation and determines the fundamental substance of the subject matter.

Disputes between Cantons or between Cantons and the Federation shall wherever possible be resolved by negotiation or mediation.

Cantons may designate official languages. In order to preserve harmony between communities, they must respect the territorial distribution of languages, and consider the linguistic minorities.

Cantons may be known or referred to differently in other languages.


Militias shall be organised by each Canton.

The Militias shall, if necessary, execute Cantonal and Federal Laws, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions.

Every man must render military service as part of a Militia, the law may provide for an alternative service. Any man who renders neither military nor alternative service shall owe a tax. This tax is levied by the Federation and is assessed and collected by the Cantons.

Cantons shall provide for organizing, training, arming, governing and disciplining, the Militia, when they are not in Federal service. Cantons shall also Appoint the Officers of the Militia.


Cantons shall be composed of Communes. Each Commune shall be represented at the Cantonal level.

The autonomy of Communes is guaranteed according to Cantonal law. In its activity, the Federation takes into account possible consequences for Communes.

At Communal level, every man eligible to vote shall have the right to sit on the Communal Council, the Council shall select their officers and executive, if they shall have any.

Communes may lay taxes to raise any necessary funding.

Communes may secede from the Canton of which they are part, however two-thirds of the electors of the Commune must support the bid for secession in an open vote. The Canton must then join another Canton or other Communes to create a new Canton.

If a Commune petitions to join a Canton, a majority of the Communes and a majority of the electors within the said Canton must agree to it in a plebiscite.


No Canton shall pass any Bill of Attainer, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts.

No Canton shall, without Federation consent, lay any Imposts or Duties on Imports or Exports.

No Canton shall, without Federation consent, lay any import or export duty, enter into any Agreement or Compact with a foreign Power, or engage in War, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent Danger as will not admit of delay.

No Cantonal government shall borrow money at any time, for any purpose.

No canton shall lay a tax on incomes, capital gains, inheritances, property or gifts.

No tax can be laid if not for the general common good. All Men shall have the right to participate personally, through their representatives and through their vote in a plebiscite to voice their wishes and opinions on any tax laid.

No Canton shall abolish, undermine or subsume any Commune without the support of a majority of the electors of that Commune.


The Federation shall guarantee to every Canton in this Federation a free Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Assembly, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence.


The General Assembly, whenever two-thirds of both Chambers shall deem it necessary, shall propose Amendments to this Constitution, or, on the Application of the Legislatures of one half of the several Cantons, or, on the application of a petition by two fifth of the people, shall call a Convention for proposing Amendments, which, in either Case, shall be valid to all Intents and Purposes, as part of this Constitution, when ratified by a majority of the people via plebiscite, the Legislatures of three-fourths of the several Cantons, or by Conventions in three-fourths thereof, as the one or the other Mode of Ratification may be proposed by the General Assembly; Provided that no Amendment which shall in any Manner affect the privileges and powers of the Cantons is passed without unanimous support of the Cantons.

Proposals that are submitted, are accepted if a majority of those who vote and a majority of the Cantons approve them. The result of a popular vote in a Canton shall determine the vote of the Canton.


This Constitution as well as the Laws of the Federation which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the Federation Government, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every Canton shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any Canton to the Contrary notwithstanding.



The enumeration of certain Rights and Liberties, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the People.


The powers not delegated, nor prohibited, are reserved to the Cantons or Communes respectively, or to the people.


All individuals shall take responsibility for themselves and shall, according to their abilities, contribute to achieving the tasks of their communities, the state and society.


THERFORE, we firmly enjoin, that all men within this Federation have and hold all the aforesaid liberties, rights, and concessions, well and peaceably, freely and quietly, fully and wholly, for themselves and their heirs, in all respects and in all places for ever. An oath, moreover, has been taken, that all these conditions aforesaid shall be kept in good faith.

Smallness Works

Well, it seems to help.

I believe that a part of our problems, whether they be economic, social or cultural stem from the prison that is the modern-day nation-state, where once we had a small and distant government rule over a small and lightly populated(by todays standards) polity, we now have a large and increasingly belligerent state, attempting to rule over millions, tens of millions and sometimes hundreds of millions of people, resulting in misrule, tyranny and increasing impoverishment.

It is a simplistic argument, I know, but hear me out. Is it at all possible that a ‘democracy’ like the United States can actually represent the will of 310 million people, in an area the size of Europe? Each representative in the Congress represents on average about half a million people, I’m not sure about you, but I don’t think it is even possible to meet half a million people in one lifetime, and even if it were, could anyone remember very many of them? Can an elected representative in the American Congress actually represent 500,000, as they would wish to be represented?

The senators, represent the states, so, the Alaskan senators, will represent about 600,000, a large number, the Californian senators will represent 35 million people. Now even if you think that there may be a possibility, however unlikely, that a representative can actually represent half a million people, can anyone, in their right mind say that someone can accurately represent 35 millions?

What about a world government? Some people seem keen on that, how many representatives would we have to a world Congress or Parliament or Assembly or whatever it might be called? One thousand? That would mean each representative would represent about seven million people, so we could increase the representatives to ten thousand, then what? Well we could all be represented, but how efficient would such an assembly be? Could there be a possibility of companies, pressure groups and others buying votes? Could it mean an ineffectual, pointless debating chamber that would quickly be overtaken in importance by the bureaucracy?

The European Union is an attempt to make things big, about 400 million people jammed together to form one state, well they are trying. The European Parliament is famous for its irrelevance, there are 736 MEPs(Members of the European Parliament) and there will be 750 MEPs at the next European elections, due to the expanding EU. Britain has 73 MEPs, Germany 99, Malta 5, France 74, Ireland 13.

Now, if for some reason, every MEP from Ireland, Malta and Britain voted against something which they believed would be harmful to them, say, banning English, they would be outvoted and their votes would mean nothing. In a world parliament, if every white nation joined together to prevent, lets say, compulsory compensation to third world states for colonialism, imperialism, apartheid, slavery and racism, what do you think the result would be?

Even democrats should be able to see this, democracy can’t, and won’t work as the state or nation becomes too large, the only form of government which works in a large nation or state is dictatorship, or at least authoritarian government. China is run by one party, Russia is a managed democracy, India is a corrupt democracy, Brazil is another corrupt democracy.

These places work, after a fashion, but they are not in any sense ‘democratic’ and nor should they be, democracy would cause chaos and lead to wholesale looting of one group or region, to placate the violent anger of another.

America is the odd one out, it resembles a managed democracy at the federal level, but at the local level can actually be very free, towns, townships and counties which are rural and white tend to be ably governed, even small states like Vermont, New Hampshire, North Dakota and other mid western and Rocky Mountain states seem to get along fine. It is when we look at the large states where problems arise, California, New York, Florida and Texas. Texas seems well run(I’m an outsider) but the diversity being allowed will kill that place too.

Small polities on the other hand seem more likely to be wealthier, healthier, happier and freer than the teeming empires of diversity and crime.

The first examples are the ones above, the small American states, they are reputedly some of the best places to live in the world. And then we have some small places in Europe;

The bailiwick of Sark, is about two square miles, it has its own government, and is very lightly taxed, no diversity(I’m sure someone will try to cure that soon), a pleasant landscape, and plenty of sea views. No poverty, no crime and no cars! only 600 people live here and their parliament, the Chief Pleas, has thirty members, meaning each person, not voter, each man woman and child has one member for every twenty of them. Now, is it possible to get to know your twenty electors? I think there is, and if three or four tell you how strongly they feel about something, do you think the representative will take notice?


The other Channel Islands are also small, rich, happy and free, Jersey, Guernsey and Alderney all have their own assemblies, elected by a few thousand people, who know each other and so can actually have an effect on their votes, and who can call them afterwards to have a cross word if necessary. None of them are in the EU, all have low taxes and good public services.

The Isle of Man is another good example of a successful small country, although it has a somewhat larger population then Sark, at 85,000 and is about 500 square miles. But it is small enough to be run well, for its own people. It has, the Manx say, the oldest parliament in the world, the Tynwald, which has 24 members, meaning that they represent about 3,500 people apiece. A massive electorate when compared to their Sark counterparts, but still a wee bit less than the half million that each American representative has. It still seems likely that each member of the House of Keys(the lower house in the Tynwald) will know a good part of his electorate, or at least be available to all of them, if they so wish. Man is rich, lightly taxed and again not in the EU. They also have a wonderful custom, where each year on Tynwald Day, they read aloud all the laws passed by their assembly over the last twelve months, in English and Manx. I imagine this may give the members pause for thought when a long and boring piece of legislation is passed, knowing they will have to stand at Tynwald hill and listen to it being read out out twice!

A Part of Man












Another interesting place is the Principality of Liechtenstein, it is a small place, that makes Switzerland look big. It is about 60 square miles and has 35,000 people. It is ruled by a prince whose family have held this fief for over 400 years, the people are rich and lightly taxed, the public services work, the streets are clean and it is not in the EU! Surprise surprise! This little place has had no experience of war since Napoleon and was the only place in Europe to give asylum to 500 Russian nationalists who fought against the Soviet Union in the Second World War, whilst larger more powerful states like the US and Britain happily handed over hundreds of thousands of poor souls who disappeared in Siberia.












San Marino, the worlds oldest republic, is a tiny little place in Italy with only 24,000 people, it is independent, and has been since St Marius established his monastery on Mont Titano in 301AD, it is not part of the EU, is rich, happy and free. It has no national debt, unlike neighbouring Italy, and has no ‘diversity’ to talk of. It is lightly taxed and has a constitution that can be traced back over 400 years.

San Marino

We have all heard of Monaco, another rich, free place ruled by a prince, and Andorra? A Co-Principality between Spain and France, which is also rich and free.

Gibraltar, a British colony on the south Spanish coast. Iceland a large country, but with a small population, only about 300,000. Luxembourg, the Faeroes and the Swiss Cantons, some of which are not much bigger than Liechtenstein.


All of these places have something in common, they are all small, all have small homogenous populations, all are wealthy, all have contented populations, all of them are well-governed and lightly taxed, all of them are free. Even the principalities, even here the people are freer then many of us who live in big ‘democratic’ states, which exposes the lie about monarchies being old-fashioned totalitarian states. Iceland was able to reject enslavement to the IMF due to its small size. A few thousand people converged on their parliament, which is about as big as a normal house, and threatened to burn it down if the parliament passed the act which would have enslaved them. This forced the government to put the issue to referendum which resulted in its rejection. Man, Sark, Alderney, Jersey and Guernsey are not completely independent, but this means very little in any real sense, they rule themselves for the most part, foreign policy and coinage being the only things they don’t have, and for small places like this, foreign policy doesn’t really mean all that much anyway. Politics in these places is extremely local, people don’t go into politics to make their fortune, or to lord it over anyone else, as who would be impressed that you are a member of the Chief Pleas or Colonial Assembly of Gibraltar?(Well I would, I would be fascinated) People don’t go into these assemblies to conquer the world, or change the world, only to have a say in how the local school is run, or to oppose licence changes for pubs, or to campaign for a road to be repaved. these are boring, irrelevant things to the entire world, except for the tiny corner where it does matter. In short, those who lust after power, leave these places for pastures new, leaving these little pieces of well-governed earth, to remain the same. Perhaps the most tory of places?

So what am I saying? Well, small government is good government. And perhaps if we are to focus on politics, we should focus on the small? Although I despise ‘democracy’ as a sham, as it is in large states like Britain and America, on a small, local scale, representative government, as opposed to democracy is a good thing. If you could go and get yourself elected to a parish council, or a town council, you could have an effect. You could oppose foolish spending, you could oppose some silly declaration or propose a good and worthwhile thing. Immigration can’t be stopped at the national level yet, perhaps we could make illegal immigrants uncomfortable at the local level by denying a business licence, you don’t have to say why, or you could oppose it on environmental grounds!

I have read that the future will be one of small states, city states and the like, I don’t know if it is true, but I do think it would be a good thing. The large, centralised, bureaucratic states of the last century are failing. They have lost their legitimacy and are about to go bust, they no longer look out for their people, they only look out for their own financial futures. Too many in government, such as that worm Tony Blair and Nickolas Sarkozy, used the power of their states to wage cowardly wars against third world nations, partly, I’m sure because it massaged their egos. A Tony Blair as a member of the Chief Pleas or House of Keys would be of no danger to the world, or even to a country, even if he managed to convince the assembly to import millions of immigrants, the other parts of the country would be ok.

So let us get elected to our small local councils, lets start positioning ourselves to be the leaders of  the remnants of these failed nation-states, I predict that this is where and how we begin to take back what has been so unjustly taken from us and ours.

‘Extreme, Rightwing, Nazi, Fascists, whowantokillsixmillionimmigrants’ win election to Greek Parliament

Well, it’s not really a surprise, but the Golden Dawn, a party that the MSM describe in their oh so creative way, as ‘Nazis, Fascists, Xenophobes, Violent Thugs, Extreme Rightwing Maniacs, whowantokillsixmillionjews’, whoops, not six million Jews, just six million of some other group!

As always, we have the usual condemnation of a party that does well, and is opposed to the cultural and ethnic destruction of their people, we don’t see any condemnation of the communists who got almost 20% of the vote, no just the ‘FACIST, NAZI, RIGHT WING EXTREMISTS’, as per usual.

What I think proves Golden Dawns point, and is a slap in the face to all true Greeks, is some Paki, who lives in Greece, moaning and complaining about the sheer, ‘horror’ of the Greek people voting for this party,

‘Javad Aslan, a spokesman for Greece’s Pakistani immigrant community, urged other political parties to work together to isolate Golden Dawn.

“This is dangerous for everyone who is living in Greece,” Aslan said. “This [result is] unbelievable for me. It is very serious, very dangerous.

“I can never believe a political party that comes with knives and bars against us, that hurts people and puts them in hospital.”

Golden Dawn says Greece should reject its bailout commitments and write off its debt.’


There you have it, some Paki’s views are more important than the ethnic Greeks, the Greeks must bow down to our new god ‘Diversity’ and worship, and failure to do so is as usual, ‘racist’.

I don’t know about you, but I’m bored of these hysterical posts, disguised as journalism, every party, without exception, that suggests immigration is not such a good idea, is pilloried as equivalent to Hitler, no matter how softly spoken, no matter how moderate, no matter how sensible. And it seems that people have begun to lose the fear of being labelled ‘racist’ as it is flung around as insult far too often. It is losing its power, and about time.

Apparently this symbol is just like the Nazi’s ‘whokilledsixmillionjews’ swastika symbol

The Meander, Golden Dawns symbol






Wow, those Greek Nazi’s are terrible using this symbol.


Kinda like this one

Ephesus Theatre














These Greek Nazi’s have obviously been around for a long time. Hey whats the betting that the Christians were also Greek Nazi’s back in the day?


Oh and this on a more modern neoclassical building

Another Nazi symbol?











It’s amazing, these Greek Nazi’s get everywhere, scrawling their symbols on buildings throughout the ages! This needs to be stopped, those evil nasty Greek Nazis ‘whowantotkillsixmillionjews’ must be stopped!

Marine Le Pen

Marine Le Pen has won about 20% of the vote in France’s Presidential Elections. This means she will not win this election, but it does mean she is the third force in French politics and will be a formidable figure on the French political scene for the foreseeable future. It makes me smile when I read frothing lefties on sites like the Huffington Post, The Guardian and others hyperventilate about Le Pen, they just don’t seem to get what is happening to the world right now, and they really don’t understand what is happening in Europe.

Le Pen has garnered more support than her father did in 2002 when he qualified for the second round, he got just under 17%, his daughter has got 19-20%.

Also, American MSM, as to be expected are speechless with her result, they can’t seem to understand that French people would want to protect France, ‘Well there’s deep concern of course because no-one expected her to do quite that well. The opinion polls were putting her at about 12, 13, 14 per cent at most. To get around 20 is a big shock and it just shows the extremities to which people have gone in this election.’ 


The future seems to be bright for Le Pen, I do hope that she wins in 2017.